Ю. Э. Даниловский
Цена: 50 руб.
РИЗ предлагает инженерам эффективный подход к усовершенствованию технических систем. Уметь находить решения сложных инженерных проблем важно для любого инноватора, работающего в области техники; соответственно, овладение ТРИЗ может стать полезной частью инженерного образования в любой конкретной области. Однако обучение ТРИЗ, даже на начальном уровне, довольно часто оказывается проблемой, поскольку обучаемые не понимают базовых понятий ТРИЗ. В данной статье мы предлагаем сместить фокус начального ТРИЗ-обучения с понятия «противоречие» на понятие «недостаток». Понятие «противоречие», применительно к техническим системам, довольно трудно воспринимается неопытными людьми. Смещение фокуса на понятие «недостаток» значительно облегчает изучение базовых идей ТРИЗ. В дальнейшем мы обучаем и концепции «противоречия» как продолжения и расширения предыдущей темы. В результате мы можем существенно интенсифицировать учебную программу в тех же временных рамках ТРИЗ-тренинга. Наш практический опыт показывает, что таким образом обучаемые лучше усваивают умения и навыки решения проблем реального мира по сравнению с традиционным способом.
Ключевые слова: ТРИЗ, образование, недостаток, противоречие.
REFERENCES
1. Altshuller, G.S. Algorithm of solving the inventive problems ARIZ-85C. 1985,
Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/ariz85v.asp
2. Altshuller, G. Creativity as an exact science: The theory of the solution of
inventive problems. Translated by Anthony Williams. 1984, USA: Gordon and Breach
Science Publishers.
3. Altshuller, G. Standards for solving inventive tasks (in Russian). 1975, Retrieved
December 1, 2014, from http://www.altshuller.ru/triz/standards1.asp
4. Altshuller, G.S. The algorithm of invention (in Russian). 1973. Moscow:
Moskovsky Rabochy.
5. Altshuller, G. The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and
technical creativity. 1999, Worcester, USA: Technical Innovation Center.
6. Altshuller, G.S. To fi nd an idea: introduction to the theory of inventive problem
solving (2nd edition, in Russian). 1991, Novosibirsk: Nauka.
7. Altshuller, G.S., & Shapiro, R.V. About a technology of creativity. Questions of
Psychology, 1956, 6, 37−49.
8. Althsuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., & Filatov, V.I. Profession: to search for new. 1985,
Kishinev: Karte Moldaveniaske.
9. Althsuller, G.S., Zlotin, B.L., Zusman, A.V., & Filatov, V.I. Search for new ideas:
from insight to technology (theory and practice of inventive problem solving). 1989,
Kishinev: Kartya Moldovenyaska Publishing House.
10. ARIZ-SMVA-91, experimental version 2 (in Russian). 1991, Kishinev: STC
Progress.
11. Becattini, N., Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. Model and algorithm for
computer-aided inventive problem analysis. Computer-Aided Design, 2012, 44, 961−986.
12. Bukhman, I. System of standard solutions. 2014, Retrieved December 1, 2014,
from http://www.triz.com.tw/isak2/Ideas_standard%20solution.html
13. Burke, L.A., & Williams, J.M. Developing Young Thinkers: An intervention
aimed to enhance children’s thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2008, No. 3,
104−124.
14. Cascini, G., Rissone, P., & Rotini, F. Business re-engineering through integration
of methods and tools for process innovation. In Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2008, Vol. 222,
No. 12, pp. 1715−1728.
15. Cavallucci, D, Rousselot, F, & Zanni, C. Assisting R&D activities through
defi nition of problem mapping. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology,
2009, 1, 131–136.
16. Danilovsky, Yu., & Ikovenko, S. Electronic reference book of typical
disadvantages as an integrated educational tool. In Proceedings of Conf. TRIZfest,
2014, Prague, Czech.
17. Danilovsky, Y., & Lenyashin, V. Ancient game “Harmful machine”. 2008,
Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.metodolog.ru/01583/01583.html
18. Domb, E., Terninko, J., Miller, J., & MacGran, E. The seventy-six standard
solutions: how they relate to the 40 principles of inventive problem solving. TRIZ
Journal, 1999, Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.triz-journal.com/seventysix-
standard-solutions-relate-40-principles-inventive-problem-solving/
19. Funke, J., & Frensch, P.A. Complex problem solving: the European perspective.
In Jonassen, D.H. (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientifi c problems (pp. 25−47),
2007, New York: Lawrence Erilbaum.
20. IHS GoldFire: Accelerating Decisions. Powering Innovation (White Paper).
2013, Retrieved December 1, 2014, from https://www.ihs.com/pdf/IHS-Goldfire-
Platform-Whitepaper_140823110913044932.pdf
21. Ivanov, G. Formula of creativity or how to learn to invent: a book for students
of secondary school (in Russian). 1994, Moscow: Prosvescheniye.
22. Jin, S.-L. Resolving complex management problems on the basis of TOC
thinking process and TRIZ innovation. In Proc. 19th International Conference on
Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Management System Innovation,
2013, pp. 1581−1588.
23. Johnson, P.E., & Johnson, R.E. The role of concrete-abstract thinking levels in
teachers’ multiethnic beliefs. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 1996,
29 (3), 134−140.
24. Khomenko, N., De Guio, R., Lelait, L., & Kaikov, I. A framework for OTSMTRIZ-
based computer support to be used in complex problem management. International
Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 2007, 30(1–2), 88−104.
25. Litvin, S. New TRIZ-based tool − function-oriented search (FOS). TRIZ Journal,
2005, Retrieved December 1, 2014, from www.triz-journal.com/archives/2005/08/04.pdf
26. Lizarraga, M.L.S.A., Baquedano, M.T.S.A., Mangado, T.G., & Cardelle-Elawar,
M. Enhancement of thinking skills: Effects of two intervention methods. Thinking
Skills and Creativity, 2009, No. 4, pp. 30−43.
27. Ogot, M., & Okudan, G. Systematic creativity methods in engineering education:
a learning styles perspective. Int. J. Eng. Education, 2006, 22(3), 566−576.
28. Sokol, A., Oget, D., Sonntag, M., & Khomenko, N. The development of inventive
thinking skills in the upper secondary language classroom. Thinking Skills and
Creativity, 2008, No. 3, pp. 34−46.
29. Zlotin, B., Bushuev, D., Haimov, E., Malkin, S., Zusman, A., Tikhonov, A., &
Pevnev, V. Automated problem formulator and solver. Patent WO9529448.
30. Zlotin, B., & Zusman, A. Directed evolution: philosophy, theory and practice.
2001, USA: Ideation International Inc.
